Correlations of Fundamental Social Motives with Personality Measures and Life History Variables
PDF

Keywords

Motivation
Life history theory
Individual differences

How to Cite

Moshkforoush, M. (2020). Correlations of Fundamental Social Motives with Personality Measures and Life History Variables. McGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal, 15(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.26443/msurj.v15i1.10

Abstract

Background: In response to the replication crisis in the field of psychology, the authors conduct a replication of the Neel et al. (2016) (1) study examining individual differences in fundamental social motives. 

Methods: Using the Fundamental Social Motives Inventory, we explore the relationships of the fundamental social motives to other individual differences and personality measures and the extent to which life history variables (e.g., age, sex, childhood environment) predict individual differences in the fundamental social motives. In addition to the replication study, the authors also incorporate the Behavioral Inhibition/Activation Scale (BIS/BAS) as a new variable to determine this measure of personality’s correlation with all seven fundamental social motives of Self-Protection, Disease Avoidance, Affiliation, Status, Mate Seeking, Mate Retention, and Kin Care. A total of 34 participants are recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk to complete the measures of personality under question. The replication criteria are set at ±0.15 r/β-units from the original study results and effect sizes greater than or equal to r/β=0.5 have to demonstrate statistical significance at the p<0.05 level.

Results: Results demonstrate that between a third and a half of all effect sizes replicate Neel et al.’s (1) findings.

Limitations: These results should be considered carefully with respect to the low sample size of our study.

Conclusion: The BIS/BAS variable proves to be most informative, indicating that the seven motives cluster under either the BIS or BAS factors with medium to large strengths of correlation. These findings contribute to discussions on considering the most accurate measures of social motivation and the implications of individual differences in psychology’s understanding of such motivational systems.

https://doi.org/10.26443/msurj.v15i1.10
PDF

© The Authors

All rights reserved

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.